LawyerLandLegal Glossary

Modifying a Custody or Support Order

Changing an existing family court order - which usually requires proving something has changed, and never happens by the parents' agreement alone.

Informational only - this is not legal advice. These definitions explain general legal vocabulary in plain English. They are not advice about your situation, reading them creates no attorney-client relationship, and the law differs from state to state and changes over time. For advice you can rely on, speak to a lawyer licensed in your state.

What it means

Family court orders are meant to last, and the law makes them difficult but not impossible to change. The usual requirement is a substantial change in circumstances since the order was made, plus - for custody - that the change sought is in the child's best interests. The threshold exists to stop the same dispute being relitigated whenever one parent is dissatisfied, and it is applied seriously.

What qualifies differs by state and by what is being modified. For child support, a significant and lasting change in either parent's income, a change in the parenting-time split, or a change in the child's needs are the common grounds; many states also allow periodic review without proving anything, and some treat a deviation of a set proportion from the guideline figure as sufficient by itself. For custody, courts look for something meaningful and durable: a relocation, a change in a child's needs, a parent's circumstances materially altering, or a persistent failure to follow the existing order.

The most consequential point is procedural. An agreement between the parents does not change the order. Parents who informally agree that a child will now live with the other, or that a lower payment is acceptable, remain bound by what the court wrote: support continues to accrue at the ordered rate, arrears can build for years, and in most states they cannot be waived retroactively even by the parent owed them. The remedy is to have the agreement made into an order, which where both parents agree is usually straightforward.

Timing matters for the same reason. Modifications are generally effective no earlier than the date the request is filed, so the time between a change in circumstances and the filing is typically lost. A parent who loses a job and waits to see how things go is usually accruing an obligation calculated on income no longer earned.

Where this comes from

Modification standards are set by state statute and case law; there is no federal standard for changing a custody or support order. Federal law shapes support review through 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(10), which requires states to review and if appropriate adjust support orders in cases receiving state services, and through the guideline requirement in 42 U.S.C. § 667. Retroactive modification of accrued child support is restricted by 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(9), which requires states to treat each instalment as a judgment when due and not subject to retroactive modification, subject to limited exceptions. Which state may modify an existing order is governed by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act for custody and by the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act for support, both of which generally leave continuing jurisdiction with the state that made the order while a party remains there. Any review interval, proportional threshold or filing deadline is fixed by state statute and none is stated here.

When people hire a lawyer for this

The advice most worth having in this area is about timing, and it is usually free to act on: file when the circumstances change rather than when the situation becomes intolerable, because the gap is rarely recoverable. Advice is worth taking where income has dropped substantially, particularly for the self-employed, since what counts as income and whether a reduction was voluntary are both contested; where the parents have agreed to a change and want it made binding, which is the cheapest work a family lawyer does and prevents the most expensive problem in this entry; where a parent is relocating; where one parent has stopped following the order; and where the parents or the child now live in different states, because which court may modify is a threshold question and an order from a court without jurisdiction is worth little.

Law firms listed in this practice area

These directory pages each list at least one currently published law firm. The list is generated when this page loads, so a page whose listings have lapsed drops out rather than becoming a dead link.

« All glossary terms

Part of the LawyerLand plain-English legal glossary. Definitions are written from primary sources - statutes and court rules - and each entry states the authority it rests on, or says plainly when the doctrine is state law with no national rule.
If you cannot afford a lawyer, civil legal aid programmes provide free help with many of these problems: civil legal aid programmes by state.